AUGUSTA, Maine — The American Civil Liberties Union of Maine is protesting a draft algorithm for the state’s adult-use marijuana program, saying a requirement for high-definition cameras exterior shops violates a brand new facial surveillance ban.
It highlights the sweeping nature of the state’s surveillance regulation, which supporters known as the strongest within the nation when it handed in 2021. The measure bars authorities entities from utilizing facial surveillance techniques or data derived from them or coming into into agreements with third events authorizing them to make use of these techniques, with some exceptions.
The principle goal of the regulation have been facial recognition techniques pushed by synthetic intelligence which have been led by tech firms and utilized by police to determine suspects in crimes. One Massachusetts Institute of Know-how research in 2018 recognized racial and gender bias in techniques that had low charges of error for light-skinned males however larger ones for dark-skinned ladies.
A draft algorithm for the state’s adult-use marijuana program makes no point out of these kinds of techniques. It solely would require companies to put in cameras that might enable for everybody coming into and exiting to be recognized. However that also quantities to a violation of the broad ban, the ACLU of Maine stated in public feedback filed with the state this week.
“There is no such thing as a persuasive rationale for ubiquitous video monitoring of hashish institutions,” the group stated.
The Maine Workplace of Marijuana Coverage, the state regulator for each the adult-use and medical applications, has roughly 4 months to both change the foundations primarily based on suggestions from the general public or enable them to enter impact as is.
The rationale for this rule was not for facial recognition techniques to proliferate, however for licensed marijuana shops to have the ability to determine a buyer on the level of sale if their presence within the retailer is later questioned, stated Matt Grondin, a spokesperson for the workplace.
“The requirement is just not and has by no means been a facial recognition requirement,” he stated.
However that doesn’t make this rule authorized, argued Michael Kebede, a lawyer for the ACLU of Maine. He known as the “surveillance state” rule a transparent violation of the ban that was coming as states and different nations are loosening rules on marijuana.
“The state can’t situation a license primarily based on having a face surveillance system,” he stated. “That’s what the rule would do.”